Level 1 article: Why democracy does not work, part 2: “The people” does not exist.

What a shocking idea. The people does not exist! So you think that the ruler could do whatever he or she wishes?

That is not what I was about, when I wrote that title. I am talking about the “people” as in the concept of “the will of the people”.

One of my readers commented on my last article about why democracy does not work:

Me: Where do you think I was confused in this article?

Reader: Æquating all concepts of democracy and ‘will of the people’ with liberal systems flooded with open sodomy and foreigners.

He does have a point indeed. I did not explain that the will of the people can vary, depends on who “the people” are.

The thing is, there has never been a unified mass of “the people” who came together and made the exact same decisions, from the first to the last. Nor has democracy ever been about choosing the best person out of a pool of candidates to be the leader of a country.

We will discuss the first of the two points above in this article. The second one will come up in the next.

As the Neoreactionary sage Nick B. Steves wrote about “the people” when he gratefully introduced my last article on Social Matter: [“The people”] are imaginary.

At the time of the American Revolution, “We the People” were basically those who called themselves “patriots”. They did not include the loyalists. 15-20% of the colonial white population were loyalists at that time. Why did “We the People” not included these people?

At the time of the infamous French Revolution, “the people” were the dissident intellectuals who roused up many angry lower class folks. And yet, there were counter revolutions in the Vendée, Aveyron and Lozère where many peasants rose up against the Revolution in the name of the king, and of their local rights and customs. Clearly the people were not unified.

Fast forward to the US election of 1860. “The people” in the South and the North voted very differently.

And now, fast forward to the 2016 one. Ever since November, the Left has been disrupting America in the name of “we the people”.

Like it or not, they are people too!

There simply has never been a unified “the people” who one day decide to march together to the presidential house and tell him or her to do this and that. It has never happened, and will never happen now, when Donald Trump has been elected. I imagine it will be the same if Hillary had been elected.

The idea of “the people” therefore, is a nonexistent concept. And since “the people” does not exist, you can never say “will of the people” or “the people have spoken again”.

Of course, one will be tempted to ask about whether a non democratic leader can make a decisions that do not harm people. This will be dealt with in a future article.

 

 

Level 1 article: What kind of Tory are you?

The natural conservative / reactionary tradition for the Anglosphere is Toryism. We stand opposed to our foes, the Whigs and their modern day descendants, both of whom are responsible for all those left leaning social changes that have happened in the Anglosphere since the 17th century.

Since I live in an Anglosphere country, that makes me naturally attracted to Toryism. However, I am aware that term has many meanings.

So, what kind of Tory are you? And me?

Am I a capitalist, British Conservative party Tory? No, no, no, no and no. Nope. Big business must not get in the way of society and God.

Am I a Victorian idealist, British Empire man? Depends on what you mean. I do not think the British Empire should try to retake the colonies. And I am also skeptical of the much touted (among reactionary circles) Victorian Age, being a Catholic. The idea of austere Victorian Protestants comes across as very repugnant to me. No offense to current Prots reading this blog.

Do I believe in an empire centred on commercial activities? Well, while I believe commercial activities are very necessary for a country, it is not something I would put above other things such as the lives of common people, arts and intellect, and sacrality. So the British Empire of the West / East Indian Companies did not sound very attractive.

Do I believe in an Anglosphere which will “lead humanity in the advance of freedom and democracy as opposed to Communism and radical Islam”? Hell no. Freedom will not beat those two things.

So that leaves me with a question: What sort of future do I want for the Anglosphere?

I am a medievalist. If I could choose a point in the past to live, I would live in medieval England, either during King Arthur’s or the Crusades’ times. The fabled medieval ages with its stable social structure beats other things that came after that. I personally believe that many aspects of its could be applied to our current world. Religiousity. Heroicism. Love of the local things and people. A king to look upon. A stable aristocratic life. And of course, being an actual warrior / knight.

So what kind of Tory are you? Consider it carefully.

 

Level 1 article: Why democracy does not work, part 1: The imaginary people’s consensus (a.k.a “The Will of the People”)

My college break started early yesterday, and will last for more than 2 weeks. I am going to use this time as a chance to self reflect, recuperate, and reorganize my life. Part of this will include a renewal of this blog’s purpose, which I will talk about later. Consider this article the start of Knight of Númenor 2.0.

As you can imagine, this article is named Level 1 because it deals with the most basic things when it comes to right wing thought. I have long wanted to spread anti egalitarian ideas among the broader Right, which is one of the reasons I started this blog in the first place, even though I have been quite distracted from the task of spreading them lately.

So, to you who read this blog, ask yourself. Do you honestly think that your ideas are better than the Left’s? If you do, then do you still want them to have a voice in how to run your life? You know they can do that through the power of voting right?

That’s basically democracy for you.   You allow people who disagree with you to have the power to potentially change your life. And I am sure you will not be happy to live in a society where the “gay community” holds regular, highly sexualized “pride parades” with children participating in it. Nor do you want your country to be flooded with foreigners who will never appreciate your culture.

The Will of the People, contrary to proponents of democracy, does not really exist. It has in fact never really existed. According to Wikipedia, 15-20% of people in the Thirteen Colonies were loyal to the British monarchy at the end of the American Revolutionary War.  I suspect that could be even higher. Where is the consensus?

In fact, the very existence of Left and Right means that there will never be a consensus of the general population. People will just follow their own side, with few decide to make the switch (although with the increasing radicalization of the Left, it seems to happen faster and more frequently). Democracy, to the opposite of what is often touted, never delivers a consensus, but only divides the population further along the lines of class, race, gender, ideology and whatnot. And it did so on the very first election season.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thoughts on modern buildings and atomization

We are living in a time and age in which most things are not meaningful anymore. A building could look like a Cathedral, but if you go into the inside, it might be a dance floor. Most skyscrapers are built in a Brutalist manner, which gives little insights into what the business offices inside are trading, unlike buildings of yore: the townsmen knew this was a church, this was the Lord Mayor’s office building, and this was the merchant’s guild. Atomized individuals waddle through cities, among a sea of constructions, not having much connections to one another, unlike cities of old in which citizens knew the history and ideals of the city they live in.

That will change though, because the Great Reset is coming.

The Battle of Châlons, and its significance to the Right today

The Battle of Châlons, also known as the Battle of the Catalaunian Fields, or the Battle of Maurica, took place in the year 451 AD. It was fought between a coalition chiefly consisted of (then Christian) Roman Empire and Visigothic tribal troops (as well as some other Germanic tribes), and another coalition made up of the Hunnic Empire and their vassals, which unfortunately came from some other Germanic tribes. I personally consider it of utmost significance to our movement, the reason of which I will explain below. On the side of Rome also stood other tribes of Germanic and even Celtic origin from Britain. One should also note the fact that many barbarian warriors fought previously as Roman troops.

Châlons is significant, not just because it is one of the last major battle fought by the Western Roman Empire, but also because it stopped the Hunnic Empire from penetrating further into Europe. As we all know, the Huns is a barbarian people with origin from the East, probably from Mongolia and Northern China. Many historians have described them as having Mongoloid appearance, and today, some Mongolians even consider the Hunnic Empire the first Mongol Empire in history. Basically, the Huns were pagan Mongoloid steppe riders. They had, prior to this battle, been very successful in pillaging and destroying large swathes of Europe. They murdered many pagan Germanic folks as well as devastated many parts of the Christian Roman Empire. They were an entirely alien people to Europe whom, through the use of force and possibly of cunning, managed to force / persuade a number of Germanic tribes to fight in their ranks against other Germanic peoples and the Roman Empire.

Fortunately, the “Western” side managed to win the battle, which stemmed the Hunnic invaders away from Western Europe subsequently, and their eventual collapse. The Hunnic leader, Attila, also known as “the Scourge of God”, died two years after the battle, and the Hunnic Empire which he managed to build during his lifelong military campaigned gradually devolved, eventually becoming a non-threat to Europe. By the way, some told me that some Hunnic tribes settle eventually in today’s Hungary and therefore became ancestors of the Hungary, although this is unclear.

There are other battles in European history, such as Thermopylae, Tours, Lepanto and Vienna, which are great European victories against an alien non European invasion fought on European soil. So, why should we consider Châlons to be the most significant to the Right of today?

As you can see, there are major parallels between Châlons and today’s war for Europe. Most notably, we see an ALLIANCE between Christians AND pagans; between a civilized, established Roman Empire and rustic, uncultured pagan Germanic tribes. It is basically the only time in history in which a combination of both pagan and Christian European folks agreed to put aside their quarrels and even clashes, in order to unite together against a non European invasion on European soil, and eventually managed to win against said non European enemy. In this most glorious battle, men of European blood from all over the continent decided to set aside their religious, tribal and national conflicts for a higher and bigger cause: the task of defending Mother Europa and her children. And the result? A glorious victory. Of course, not everything is great and nice about this battle. Both sides suffered heavy losses, and Theodoric, king of the Visigoth, was martyred during this battle. One account said that he was killed by an Ostrogoth named Andag. It is also very shameful that Andag was not the only “white” person to fight for the Asiatic Huns, many did so as well, as you will know from the link I provide in the comment. In the end, however, the force of Good triumphed, and Europe was saved.

The situation today in Europe and the Greater West is very similar (of course, with some difference). Non European invaders are here on European soil, killing, pillaging and raping, and planning to conquer our lands. The nationalists of Europe all have hearts and spirit, but are divided into camps based on religious and ideological differences, which is close to how the Christian Romans and the pagan Germanic tribes fought against each other for some time. Many of our own countries and regions also hold old grudges against others; just like pagans and Christians, Romans and barbarians used to fight one another. Worst of all, many of our folks, through a combination of either naivete, fear, cowardice, mental insanity, greed and lust for power, decided to turn against their brothers and sisters and support the invaders. In fact, I personally think it is possible that the most dishonourable and insane sector of the “traitors” (Antifa drug addicts coming to mind?) might as well convert to the Eastern death cult when the Day of War comes, because they are soaken in a dark self hatred for their own blood and heritage, and also because they would rather align themselves with so called “oppressed” Muslims against “racist” white people, out of cringing ideological reasons.

We should not, however, be afraid of the test that come to us, and most of all, not try to create and hold hatred amongst ourselves, even though we are different to one another. Whether you are pagan, Christian, agnostic or atheist; fascist, capitalist, natsoc, monarchist or republican, we should all look to what our ancestors did on the fields of Châlons, and do the same thing today.

It is only through unity that our ultimate victory can be achieved. It does not matter what your background is when you all are devoted to the holy cause of defending Europa. I for one, would gladly fight alongside my pagan and atheistic brothers and give my life away for the holy cause of protecting my kinfolk, even though I am a Christian. I hope you will do the same as our ancestors did at Châlons, where the pagans and the Christians, the Romans, Germanics and Celtics came together to fight and give their lives for Europe. Forget all past schisms, and do what Aetius and Theodoric did, because the forces of Light shall reward us with a glorious end.

Through unity, we shall ride together to victory. Vivat Europa!

Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Catalaunian_Plains

Some lights in darkness?

I saw a girl liking my post. Upon checking her blog out, I saw that she is a pro refugee liberal. I can only tell her: It is not hateful to want to protect your nation from rapists, murderers and conquerors from the religion of Radical Islam. Please look up the word “rapefugee” and you will see what I mean. It’s not right wing propaganda, unless you mean the rape of Cologne is propaganda created by white nationalists. I am not white, btw.

But anyway, I saw people on the left blaming the right for “hiring the anarchists” to create troubles at Berkeley.

This is the light in the darkness.

People who are either fearful, or truly wish for peace, hate violence.
Perhaps in time, they will see through the nature of the Left, and cease to support them.

Great. I will shake your hands.

On current events: Reap what you sow?

Or as some other Reactionary blogger says: “You killed kings for this”. Tragic.

The ironic, bitter outcome of “freedom” is totalitarianism, brought forth via degeneracy unleashed during the Shameful Sixties. It will now take a strong authoritarian man to do it. I hope the man is Trump.

Brought to you by, ironically, the classical liberal Facebook group “Thomas Sowell Foundation”.

Edit: Actually, the reign of degeneracy started way earlier than the 1960’s. More like since the French Revolution, or perhaps even earlier since the 1600’s.

Image may contain: text